ACAS Code of Practice – the right to be accompanied during disciplinary procedures

Home Articles ADVICE & GUIDANCE ACAS Code of Practice – the right to be accompanied during disciplinary procedures

You may not be aware that ACAS has published a revision to its code of practice concerning disciplinary and grievance issues in the workplace. The changes relate to the sections around accompanying work colleagues to disciplinary or grievance meetings and came into effect from 11 March 2015.

A judgment made by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of Total v GB Oils clarified the rules around reasonable requests to be accompanied at a grievance or disciplinary hearing. It found that workers had the right to be accompanied at these hearings by a companion as long as they were either a trade union official, certified union representative or a fellow worker.

Companion Rules

  • A trade union representative who is not an employed official must have been certified by their union as being competent to accompany a worker.
  • Employers must agree to a worker’s request to be accompanied by any companion from one of these categories and workers may also alter their choice of companion if they wish.
  • Employees don’t have to make their request within a specific timeframe. The Code suggests that they should provide their employer with enough time to ‘deal with’ the presence of their companion at the meeting.

The revisions to the Code make it crystal clear that employers cannot reject a worker’s choice of companion because they may find that person’s presence awkward or difficult. However, they can still reject anyone who is not one of the employer’s workers or a trade union official or representative – such as a lawyer or a relative.

In making their choice, workers should bear in mind the practicalities of the arrangements. A worker may choose to be accompanied by a companion who is suitable, willing and available on site rather than someone from a geographically remote location.

If the worker’s chosen companion is not available at the time proposed for the hearing by the employer, the employer must postpone the hearing to a time proposed by the employee, provided that the alternative is both reasonable and not more than five working days after the date originally proposed.


For more information about me, come see my profile: Lindsay Parkinson


Social Media

Latest Posts

RIDDOR Landing page v x

What are RIDDOR Regulations & What are Employer’s Responsibilities for RIDDOR Reportable Incidents?

Firstly many people ask what RIDDOR means, RIDDOR stands for reporting injuries diseases, and dangerous occurrences. Accidents at work can happen, even with the best …

An Employer Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

An Employer’s Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

Without wishing to delve too heavily into the current (alleged) political shenanigans, there has been much discussion about the announcement of an investigation by the …

covid vaccine 800x296 1

Your Complete Guide to Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations

Earlier this month the government announced that The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 amendment had been passed by Parliament. The …

working from home

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers?

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers? There has been a lot of media coverage recently about various companies who are reducing sick pay …

working from home

Working from home: FAQs for employers

This week the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson announced the implementation of Plan B of its COVID-19 winter response due to rising numbers of COVID-19 cases …