Reading Employee’s Emails Breached Human Rights

Home Articles Industry News Reading Employee’s Emails Breached Human Rights
mobile phones

It is not often that human rights arguments are heard in the workplace. They do happen, however, and recently the European Court of Human Rights made an important ruling which overturned a previous decision regarding employer’s email monitoring practices.

The monitoring – which included reading an employee’s personal emails – was a breach of an employee’s human rights.

Right to Privacy

Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 protects an individual’s right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence. Correspondence includes letters and emails.

Since the introduction of email communication in the workplace, employers have implemented policies with the aim of ensuring that employees do not misuse the technology. These policies are perfectly acceptable provided that certain safeguards are also implemented to avoid claims of an Article 8 breach.

Employer begins Email Monitoring

An employer in Romania asked one of its employees, Barbulescu, to create a Yahoo Messenger email account for work purposes so that he could communicate with clients. Barbulescu was told that he was not to use the account for sending personal non-work related emails.

However, the employer found that personal emails had been sent from the account, to Barbulescu’s fiancée and brother. The emails contained personal information regarding the employee’s health and were occasionally intimate in nature.

When the employer raised the issue, Barbulescu maintained that he had not broken the rules. The employer then presented him with a transcript of the exchanges and was dismissed.

Barbulescu alleged the monitoring was a breach of his right to privacy and took the claim to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The ECtHR disagreed, declaring the employer had been permitted to read the emails.

Decision overturned

The Grand Chamber of the ECtHR has subsequently found that Barbulescu’s right to privacy was breached. Integral to the decision was the lack of evidence that Barbulescu had been told in advance of the monitoring and there had had been no consideration by the previous courts as to whether there had been a less intrusive method of dealing with the potential breach of email rules. There is no more opportunity for appeal, so this is the final decision.

It is important for employers to understand the implications of this decision. Misleading reports of the initial decision led employers to believe they were able to monitor employees’ emails freely – this was not the case.

Similarly, the Grand Chamber ruling does not prohibit all monitoring.

Practical Considerations

Email monitoring is allowed for employers provided a certain criteria are met, including:

  • Have a legitimate reason for email monitoring.
  • Balance your business needs against the rights of the employee to a private life. The unlimited right to look at all emails may set the employee’s expectation of no privacy but is that proportionate?
  • Warn employees clearly in advance that their emails will be monitored, and the reasons for monitoring.

Consider whether there are less intrusive methods for dealing with a potential breach of your rules than reading the emails.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Social Media

Latest Posts

RIDDOR Landing page v x

What are RIDDOR Regulations & What are Employer’s Responsibilities for RIDDOR Reportable Incidents?

Firstly many people ask what RIDDOR means, RIDDOR stands for reporting injuries diseases, and dangerous occurrences. Accidents at work can happen, even with the best …

An Employer Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

An Employer’s Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

Without wishing to delve too heavily into the current (alleged) political shenanigans, there has been much discussion about the announcement of an investigation by the …

covid vaccine 800x296 1

Your Complete Guide to Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations

Earlier this month the government announced that The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 amendment had been passed by Parliament. The …

working from home

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers?

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers? There has been a lot of media coverage recently about various companies who are reducing sick pay …

working from home

Working from home: FAQs for employers

This week the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson announced the implementation of Plan B of its COVID-19 winter response due to rising numbers of COVID-19 cases …

On Key

Related Posts