Working longer hours

Home Articles Industry News Working longer hours

Clashes have erupted over tfl’s plan to run a 24-hour Tube service at weekends from the 12th September 2015, with the RMT reacting angrily at how the plan will affect Tube workers. The plan includes a ‘Night Tube’ to run on Fridays and Saturdays, aimed at cutting journey times by an average of 20 minutes. On the face of it, the idea looks a good one: London is a 24-hour, bustling city that demands responsive transport networks to help people manage their lives and increasingly fragmented working hours. However the RMT union have argued against the plan, calling it a ‘disaster waiting to happen,’ and lacking in detail. RMT general secretary Mick Cash said ‘this proposal is now being bulldozed through without proper risk assessment or agreement on core issues.’ How an increase in operating hours will affect current workers remains unsure, with RMT voicing concern that increases will compromise current working hours agreements with employees, resulting in longer hours.

With the majority of planned change, timing is crucial, and it seems no coincidence that the current pay deal for tfl staff comes to an end in April. Obviously this new plan will certainly affect and lead negotiations.

Changing employment conditions agreed in a contract – such as increasing working hours – is difficult and can result in negative consequences for the employer. Contracts are inherently inflexible, purposely so in order to protect both parties and guide them on responsibilities and expectations. Employers can theoretically dismiss the workforce directly affected by an operation change, such as increased hours, and offer a new deal. Or those who have foreseen possible change might have included a clause in the employment contract giving the employer the rights to make changes to working hour and the expectation that the employee is willing to work shift-hours. Although these changes in working times can only be a reorganisation of existing hours, and not an increase or extension beyond what is agreed in the original contract.

For tfl, the better option, should they wish to utilise current employers to manage the extension in hours, is the oldest incentive in the book: increased pay. Alternatively, and more likely, given there are no plans to cut back the service, tfl will have to consider employing more staff to cover the full service.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Social Media

Latest Posts

RIDDOR Landing page v x

What are RIDDOR Regulations & What are Employer’s Responsibilities for RIDDOR Reportable Incidents?

Firstly many people ask what RIDDOR means, RIDDOR stands for reporting injuries diseases, and dangerous occurrences. Accidents at work can happen, even with the best …

An Employer Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

An Employer’s Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

Without wishing to delve too heavily into the current (alleged) political shenanigans, there has been much discussion about the announcement of an investigation by the …

covid vaccine 800x296 1

Your Complete Guide to Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations

Earlier this month the government announced that The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 amendment had been passed by Parliament. The …

working from home

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers?

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers? There has been a lot of media coverage recently about various companies who are reducing sick pay …

working from home

Working from home: FAQs for employers

This week the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson announced the implementation of Plan B of its COVID-19 winter response due to rising numbers of COVID-19 cases …

On Key

Related Posts