Does power corrupt?

Home Articles Industry News Does power corrupt?

He is rarely out of the headlines, and never for the right reasons. Dov Charney is the founder of the US clothing manufacturer, distributor and retailer American Apparel. He is also a highly controversial figure who courted media attention with regular public and sleazy acts that often transgressed into misconduct, such as dancing naked in front of female colleagues. His position as leader of the business put him above normal morals, or so he thought, considering his unsavoury acts as inseparable from American Apparel’s edgy brand.

Yet the exception came to an end last month when American Apparel’s board decided it had gone too far and kicked Charney out of the boardroom for alleged misconduct and violations of company policy. Rather than more chaos, the American Apparel hierarchy have come to the conclusion that greater stability and maturity is needed at a time when the company’s stock price continues to fall.

Whether American Apparel manages to dispel to turbulence created by Charney and replace it with strong leadership is yet to be seen, as are the benefits. Strong leaders aren’t always predictable. Think of Silicon Valley and the high number of multi-million dollar businesses that thrive off iconoclast leaders who deliberately set themselves the task of disrupting the game. Without the power there would be nothing – no change or progress, no struggle or victory. All would be flat.

Yet due to the vanguard nature of power, with leaders always out on the edge pushing boundaries, is it unrealistic to expect it won’t be a corrupting influence? Or is it simply the people who crave power that need to come with a warning sign?

There’s the argument that the corrupting nature of power is physiological. Previous tests show that high levels of the hormone testosterone leads to reduced empathy and increased antisocial behaviour, which seem the ideal antecedent to corrupt behaviour. Yet this argument only accounts for men.

Other arguments suggest that it is possible that power corrupts, yet it is likely that some individuals have a natural inclination to seek power because they are of a certain character disposition, with little moral direction that allows for abuses of power.

In recent psychological tests, results showed that leaders put in high power positions took antisocial decisions at a significantly higher rate than leaders in low-power positions. Despite being honest individuals, many participants put in high-power positions often succumbed to the corruptive effects of power, indicating that power itself does corrupt.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Social Media

Latest Posts

RIDDOR Landing page v x

What are RIDDOR Regulations & What are Employer’s Responsibilities for RIDDOR Reportable Incidents?

Firstly many people ask what RIDDOR means, RIDDOR stands for reporting injuries diseases, and dangerous occurrences. Accidents at work can happen, even with the best …

An Employer Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

An Employer’s Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

Without wishing to delve too heavily into the current (alleged) political shenanigans, there has been much discussion about the announcement of an investigation by the …

covid vaccine 800x296 1

Your Complete Guide to Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations

Earlier this month the government announced that The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 amendment had been passed by Parliament. The …

working from home

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers?

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers? There has been a lot of media coverage recently about various companies who are reducing sick pay …

working from home

Working from home: FAQs for employers

This week the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson announced the implementation of Plan B of its COVID-19 winter response due to rising numbers of COVID-19 cases …

On Key

Related Posts