Sex Discrimination: A Single Remark Costs Employers Dearly

Home Articles Discrimination and Equality Sex Discrimination: A Single Remark Costs Employers Dearly
a
meeting

A recent case has shown exactly how hard it can be for employers to navigate tricky situations with employees without inadvertently straying into the kind of behaviour which runs a risk of a sex discrimination claim.

A manager’s remark – a single comment – has been taken to constitute sex discrimination and cost the employer over £350,000. In the face of such uncertainty, how can employers ensure they don’t open themselves up in the same way?

Employer attempted to console upset employee

In BAE Systems v Konczak, a female employee got upset during a discussion about her work location. Konczak’s request to move to a specific location had been turned down and her manager had suggested an alternative. This would have meant working with colleagues about whom Konczak had previously raised allegations of sexual harassment, and Konczak was extremely distressed at the proposal. She began to cry and her manager said words to the effect of “women take things more emotionally than men, while men tend to forget things and move on”.

Konczak made several claims at Employment Tribunal, all of which were dismissed except for a claim of sex discrimination on account of her manager’s comment. The Employment Tribunal found, on the basis of the single remark, that Konczak had suffered sex discrimination.

Unfortunately, Konczak went on to have a mental breakdown. The psychiatric injury caused by her treatment was the reason for the huge financial award.

Implications of the decision

Employers should note the financial award – over £350,000 – was not down to the comment alone. The amount of compensation was a direct result of the impact that the treatment had had on her which was, in this case, extreme and so will not be a feature in the vast majority of cases.

Despite this, the important point to this case is the comment made by the manager, which may well have been intended to comfort the employee, was discriminatory towards her as a woman. How can employers guard themselves against similar claims?

  • Be aware of all of the protected characteristics: sex, disability, age, religion or belief, sexual orientation, pregnancy/maternity, gender reassignment, race and marriage/civil partnership;
  • Train your employees in recognising the type of situations or conversations which could lead to allegations of discrimination;
  • Don’t make any assumptions on grounds related to the protected characteristics e.g. that women are physically less capable than men or someone nearing retirement is less committed to work than a younger colleague;

Don’t make comments based on any assumption as set out above, even if you don’t actually hold that view.

Share:
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Social Media

Latest Posts

RIDDOR Landing page v x

What are RIDDOR Regulations & What are Employer’s Responsibilities for RIDDOR Reportable Incidents?

Firstly many people ask what RIDDOR means, RIDDOR stands for reporting injuries diseases, and dangerous occurrences. Accidents at work can happen, even with the best …

An Employer Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

An Employer’s Guide to Disciplinary Action and Police Investigations

Without wishing to delve too heavily into the current (alleged) political shenanigans, there has been much discussion about the announcement of an investigation by the …

covid vaccine 800x296 1

Your Complete Guide to Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations

Earlier this month the government announced that The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 amendment had been passed by Parliament. The …

working from home

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers?

Can employers adjust sick pay for unvaccinated workers? There has been a lot of media coverage recently about various companies who are reducing sick pay …

working from home

Working from home: FAQs for employers

This week the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson announced the implementation of Plan B of its COVID-19 winter response due to rising numbers of COVID-19 cases …